October 2009

Key US House panel approves consumer protection agency

WASHINGTON (AFP) –
A key US House of Representatives panel voted Thursday to create a government agency to defend consumers from abuses by financial institutions partly blamed for sparking the global economic crisis.

US President Barack Obama cheered the 39-29 vote by the House Financial Services Committee as a clear victory for guarding Americans against predatory lending and giving them clear information about credit cards and mortgages.

"The creation of the agency is part of a broader regulatory reform effort that we are working on with Congress to bring a new sense of responsibility and accountability to our financial system," Obama said in a statement.

Obama's Republican foes mostly oppose the measure, while his Democratic allies mostly favor the new agency, which must now clear the full House of Representatives and the Senate before the president can sign it into existence.

"While there is more work ahead, today we are much closer to putting in place strict new rules of the road for the financial industry," said US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

Obama has made creation of the agency a key plank of his plans to overhaul the rules of the US financial system, ground zero for the global economic meltdown of 2008.

Under industry pressure, however, the committee carved out exemptions for a range of financial players.

Cap Cana Villa

Cap Cana is located in the Eastern region of the Dominican Republic known as Juanillo. The site was founded as a new and more ambitious touristic site with contributions from international investors and strategic partners such as Ritz-Carlton, Sotogrande, Donald Trump and many others. The site has a Marina, Large resorts, beaches, and many others. Primarily founded as a site to attract international visitors. The Cap Cana Championship, a Champions Tour golf tournament, is held at Punta Espada Golf Club in Cap Cana, a course designed by Jack Nicklaus.

Cap Cana is a tourism development with an investment of upwards of two billion dollars in the eastern lands of the Dominican Republic. This area renown for its great hotels and beaches, lacks exclusivity to the high upper class which Cap Cana hopes, in part, to offer. The area was conceived with the backing both financially and publicly of "elites" such as Donald Trump, Jack Nicklaus, and other holders.

Cap Cana Villa

Millions to Rally Against Poverty This Weekend (OneWorld.net)

WASHINGTON, Oct 16 (OneWorld.net) - Well over 100 million people around the world are expected to "stand up" this weekend to call governments to action on poverty, hunger, and gender inequalities -- a set of global issues that most Americans say they would like their government to fund much more than it has.

What's the Story?

Last year, some 116 million people worldwide took part in the weekend-long events to "Stand Up, Take Action, End Poverty Now!" That set a new Guinness World Record for largest mobilization of human beings in recorded history. Organizers are aiming to break that record this year.

Participants are calling on their governments to take concrete steps to achieve the so-called Millennium Development Goals, a set of eight targets to cut extreme poverty and hunger in half, reduce HIV/AIDS and child and maternal mortality, get children into school, and ensure women's equality in society, all while protecting the environment. World leaders agreed at a summit in 2000 to commit the funding and implement the programs necessary to achieve the goals by 2015.

"With just six years left until the deadline ... 'Stand Up' will be a stark reminder that citizens will not accept excuses for governments breaking promises to the world's poorest and most vulnerable citizens," said Salil Shetty, Director of the United Nations Millennium Campaign, in a statement this week.

"This year's mobilization will place particular emphasis on telling world leaders that their track record on women's rights, maternal mortality, and hunger is unacceptable," Shetty added. "Citizens refuse to accept the fact that 70 percent of the people living in poverty are women and children and 500,000 women continue to die annually in the process of giving life, and they are demanding urgent action from their leaders."

Thousands of "Stand Up" events will be held across the world this weekend, from a lamp-lighting ceremony during India's Festival of Lights to a "poverty hearing" in Peru. Attendees at a college football game in Montreal will be asked to stand up against poverty, and New Yorkers will "Stand Up and Dance" tonight at a party organized by the humanitarian group Mercy Corps and the ONE Campaign. Across Europe, radio stations will simultaneously play Bob Marley's "Get Up, Stand Up" on Saturday. [» Read more about the Stand Up events below.]

Charting Progress

The latest United Nations progress report shows that, while important advances have been made toward most of the goals, not enough has been done to achieve them by 2015 in all parts of the world.

As of June 2008, for example, South Asia was on track to meet the anti-poverty and universal education goals, but only one of the three women's equality targets and two of the four environmental marks. On the health goals, the region, which includes India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal as well as several other less populous nations, was only on track to reverse the spread of tuberculosis; efforts have not been sufficient to meet the child mortality, maternal health, or HIV/AIDS goals, if current trends continue.

In Latin America and the Caribbean, by contrast, poverty and employment rates remain a serious concern, along with school enrollment levels, maternal health and HIV/AIDS. But the hunger, child mortality, and tuberculosis goal are likely to be met, along with three of the four environmental targets and two of the three women's equality goals.

Sub-saharan Africa, however, is not on track to meet a single goal.

The global economic crisis and the impacts of climate change threaten to further stymie progress, warned UN chief Ban Ki-moon in the forward to the UN report, but a renewed commitment from world leaders can still ensure the goals' achievement.

"The right policies and actions, backed by adequate funding and strong political commitment, can yield results," said Ban. "Fewer people today are dying of AIDS, and many countries are implementing proven strategies to combat malaria and measles, two major killers of children. The world is edging closer to universal primary education, and we are well on our way to meeting the target for safe drinking water."

"Our efforts to restore economic growth should be seen as an opportunity to take some of the hard decisions needed to create a more equitable and sustainable future," added Ban. [» Check out the UN progress reports.]

Finding the Money

There is plenty of money available to reach the goals -- the evidence is in the hundreds of billions of dollars found to bail out banks around the world last year, said Adelaide Sosseh of the Global Call to Action Against Poverty, an international umbrella group of organizations that is helping to organize this week's "Stand Up" events.

Education experts believe, for example, that just $11 billion more per year could ensure "education for all" by 2015.

The price tag on ending world hunger is estimated at about $30 billion a year.

And Americans have said they would be willing to pay their share, as long as other countries did the same.

An October 2008 poll found that 77 percent of people in the United States would be willing to pay their part of the cost -- estimated at about $56 per person per year -- to cut hunger in half and reduce severe poverty by 2015.

The cost was determined by divvying up among the world's industrialized nations the estimated $39 billion needed to reduce extreme poverty and cut hunger in half. Countries were assumed to pay different amounts depending on the size of their own economies. 

Similar majorities in six of the seven other industrialized countries polled said they would also be willing to pay their share: $49 per person in Great Britain, $45 in France, $43 in Germany, $39 in Italy, $23 in South Korea, and $10 in Turkey.

A smaller majority -- 54 percent -- of Russians were also in favor of paying their country's share of the costs, about $11 per person per year. [» Check out all the poll results.]

A similar poll in 2005 found that 70 percent of people in the United States were in favor of paying their country's share of up to $80 billion per year to achieve all eight of the Millennium Development Goals.

But according to the nonprofit Center for Global Development, which ranks wealthy countries' commitment to foreign assistance each year, the United States only gives about 28 cents per person per year in aid -- 20 cents per person in government-funded initiatives, and another 8 cents per person in charitable giving to aid organizations working in developing countries. 

When considering aid, trade, investment, migration, technology, and a host of other policies impacting people in developing countries, the United States scored 17th out of 22 industrialized nations in its overall "commitment to development," according to researchers at the Center. [» Check out the Commitment to Development Index.]

Putting the Money to Good Use

Americas have long been skeptical about the effectiveness of aid provided to developing countries whose political and economic systems are often not the most transparent.

Humanitarian workers and analysts say, however, that while those fears are understandable, aid money has done a lot of good worldwide and is increasingly effective.

"These funds need not find themselves in the hands of local warlords or corrupt governments," says Tom Peterson of Heifer International, which provides farm animals to families in developing countries to help build incomes. "[Aid funds] work their way through assistance organizations. Much of the good work going on today is focused on building capacity and scaling up a development network that is both effective and transparent."

Oxfam International's Paul O'Brien agrees. Speaking to OneWorld readers in an online dialogue earlier this year, O'Brien wrote: "Aid is working, but just not as well as it should. In these economically trying times, we can't afford to waste money, but neither can we afford to give up on the global poor or pretend that their problems won't affect us if we ignore them."

O'Brien and Sheila Herrling of the Center for Global Development said that new efforts to "modernize" the way foreign assistance is channeled are starting to ensure more bang for every buck. Both are members of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network of analysts and aid groups calling on the U.S. government to take concrete steps to improve the way it provides international assistance funds, learning from the successes and mistakes of the past.

In recognition of tomorrow's UN-sponsored International Day for the Eradication of Poverty, the student campaigning group Americans for Informed Democracy is calling on its activists to tell Congress to do just that.

"With a new president and a new Congress, we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reform U.S. foreign assistance," the group's Sarah Frazer wrote to supporters today. "Tell Congress the U.S. needs a fresh approach to global development -- one that streamlines our aid, eliminates long-standing inefficiencies, and increases the impact of our dollars, even in a time of economic hardship." [» Learn more about the call-in campaign.]

But despite its shortcomings, foreign assistance dollars have already brought about many remarkable achievements, noted Herrling in the OneWorld dialogue earlier this year.

"Over the past decades, our assistance has: created the capacity for millions of people to feed their families through the green revolution; nearly eradicated river blindness and polio; helped Mozambique, El Salvador, and other countries rebound from civil war; stimulated economic growth in countries around the world; saved millions of lives each year through routine vaccinations and access to basic health care; and put hundreds of thousands of HIV patients on life-saving anti-retroviral treatments. These are not small accomplishments," she said.

But the 100 million people "Standing Up" this weekend are hoping to convince their governments to accomplish even more -- and move faster -- in the years to come.

» Discuss this article on OneWorld.net

» OneWorld.net's Perspectives Magazine: Foreign Assistance - What Happens with All That Money? 

» OneWorld TV: One Brit 'Stands Up and Speaks Out'

More from OneWorld:

» 'Alternative' Nobel to Climate Educator

» Africa Drought 'Worst in Decades'

» Guinea Soldiers Threatening Journalists

» World Cup Goal: Educate Every Kid

Millions Mobilize Worldwide and on Web Demanding That World Leaders Eradicate Poverty

From: Millennium Campaign

October 12, 2009

After a year in which progress on eradicating global poverty has
actually reversed, millions of people will come together across
continents, cultures and time zones next week to tell their governments
in no uncertain terms what they want them to do: End Poverty Now!

Citizens
will gather at events across the globe on October 16-18, 2009 as part
of “Stand Up, Take Action, End Poverty Now!” to demand that world
leaders achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) – a set of
promises to eradicate extreme poverty and its root causes by 2015. In a
sign of the massive global demand for the achievement of the MDGs, last
year more than 116 million people participated in “Stand Up,”
shattering the Guinness World Record for the largest mobilization of
human beings in recorded history.

“With just six years left
until the deadline by which heads of state have pledged to eradicate
extreme poverty and its root causes, ‘Stand Up’ will be a stark
reminder that citizens will not accept excuses for governments breaking
promises to the world’s poorest and most vulnerable citizens,” said
Salil Shetty, Director of the United Nations Millennium Campaign. “This
year’s mobilization will place particular emphasis on telling world
leaders that their track record on women’s rights, maternal mortality
and hunger is unacceptable. Citizens refuse to accept the fact that 70
percent of the people living in poverty are women and children and
500,000 women continue to die annually in the process of giving life,
and they are demanding urgent action from their leaders.”

“Millions of people are standing up against poverty, while politicians
are sitting on their hands,” said Adelaide Sosseh, Co-Chair of the
Global Call to Action Against Poverty (GCAP)
based in The Gambia. “The combined effects of the economic, climate and
food crises are affecting people of all ages and stations in life, in
all countries – especially women — but those already living in poverty
are the hardest hit. Given the amounts found to bail out banks in just
a year, we know the resources are not lacking. It´s this lack of
political will to tackle poverty that remains the biggest motivation
behind Stand Up participation.”

Harnessing Technology To Connect The World and Mobilize Online

This
year, for the first time, organizers will take advantage of the awesome
power and reach of digital technology to make mobilization and
engagement possible online. The UN Millennium Campaign has partnered
with Skype and Ustream, the leading live online video platform that
enables anyone to broadcast to a global audience of unlimited size. The
unique partnership will bridge technologies in order to connect the
world in conversation about the most important issues facing our
generation.

On October 12-15, in the lead-up to the mobilization, former Irish
President Mary Robinson and African entertainers Femi Kuti and
Angelique Kidjo will be amongst a group of high profile decision makers
and cultural celebrities participating in a 30 minute conversation with
ordinary citizens around the world to discuss poverty and its root
causes. For the first time ever, the Skype calls will be broadcast live
on Facebook, thanks to technology provided by Ustream. Viewers will be
encouraged to start their own conversations about poverty and its root
causes on these powerful social networking platforms. For more details
and to watch and participate in the conversations live visit
www.facebook.com/mcampaign.

Media
wishing to view or embed the live conversations can visit
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/stand-up-against-poverty and media
wishing to download and broadcast the clips after the conversations
have occurred should use http://ustream.tv/UNcampaign. Both links will
be active on October 13.

Citizens can also visit
www.standagainstpoverty.org beginning on October 16 to Stand Up
virtually and be counted towards what organizers hope will be a new
Guinness World Record.

Actions Around the World

Amongst the thousands of “Stand Up” events being planned across every inhabited continent are:

In
Nairobi, Kenya, an anti- hunger concert dubbed Free the Hungry Billion,
Stand Up and Take Action, will bring together development-conscious
musicians from across the African continent, including Oliver Mutukudzi
(Zimbabwe), Susan Owiyo (Kenya), Professor Jay (Tanzania), Didier Awadi
(Senegal), Ntsiki Mazwai (South Africa), Carlou D (Senegal), Nameless
(Kenya) and Wahu (Kenya). Food donations will be collected from
attendees.

Also in Kenya, thousands of people are expected to
attend the Western Kenya Utamaduni Festival to celebrate the region’s
culture through music, drama and bull-fighting performances and
advocate for pro-poor development, focused on food security. The event
will be hosted by a Member of Parliament who is Chairman of the Public
Accounts Committee.

In Nigeria, thousands of people are
expected to attend various concerts over the three-day mobilization by
performers including Sarah Mitaru and Femi Kuti, who will honor the
life and work of renowned African musician/AIDS
activist Fela Kuti. The performers will explore the MDGs and the issues
of social injustice, exclusion and poverty through song and dance. They
will also sign a petition demanding accountability and transparency in
their governments in order to achieve the MDGs.

In Zimbabwe,
residents from Harare’s high density suburbs are expected to
participate in a sports gala organized by Transparency International,
where 20 teams will compete in soccer, volleyball and netball games.
The activity will provide the residents of the suburbs with a platform
to hold their leaders accountable for their promises to end poverty.

In
the Philippines, the Millennium Campaign will launch an “I Vote for the
MDGs” campaign during “Stand Up” by surveying citizens about the issues
they want their leaders to prioritize, in preparation for the May 2010
national and local elections. Results of the survey will be presented
to the country’s presidential candidates during a forum on October 20.

In
India, citizens will gather at India Gate on October 16 to light a lamp
to symbolize the dispersal of the darkness of poverty and illiteracy,
against the backdrop of the festival of lights that begins on October
17th across the country. At the event, organized by the National
Confederation of Dalit Organizations, intellectuals, Members of
Parliament, civil society and youth groups will demand implementation
of the Urban Employment Guarantee Act to provide livelihood
opportunities to millions of people living in poverty in urban slums
across the country.

Also in India, from October 16-18
campaigners from Wada Na Todo Abhiyan will launch the second phase of
the “9 is Mine” campaign across more than 100 Parliamentary
constituencies, demanding functional health centers and schools in
every village, town and city of the country. Across bus stands,
schools, hospitals, railway stations, bazaars, parks and places of
worship, the public will be asked to assess the functionality of their
health centers and schools.

In Bangladesh, tens of thousands
of people are expected to attend a massive rally at Bangabandhu
National Stadium in Dhaka on October 17, inaugurated by Prime Minister
Sheikh Hasina. The rally will encourage the government to make fighting
poverty a major goal of Vision 2021, the long-term plan being developed
in advance of the country’s 2021 Golden Jubilee. The event will be
telecast on 10 screens in other public places throughout Dhaka.

In
Nepal, the President will read a Stand Up Pledge with members of the
Constituent assembly at an event organized by the National Planning
Commission and UN in Nepal at the President’s Official residence,
broadcast live on national television. This will be followed by a
concert hosted by the Millennium Campaign and Art of Living, where
thousands of people are expected to gather in a large open-air theatre
in the heart of Kathmandu on October 16 to Stand Up for peace and the
reduction of poverty in Nepal. The concert will feature folk songs,
religious songs set to the tune of rock music and performances by some
of Nepal’s top singers.

A report will be launched on MDG
progress at a poverty hearing in Peru on October 17, bringing together
rural citizens to call on their government to combat maternal and child
mortality and assure healthcare for women. An “alternative budget” with
a concrete plan for how the government can achieve the MDGs will be
presented to Parliament.

Across Europe, on October 17 from 7:00-9:00 PM(GMT
+ 1 hour), radio stations will simultaneously play Bob Marley’s song
“Get Up, Stand Up.” The song will also be played often throughout the
three-day mobilization in Europe, reminding audiences of the
mobilization happening across the globe.

On October 16-17, the cities of Barcelona, Munich, Paris and Milan will be awarded with the “MDG
Committed City Seal” for their role in promoting the Millennium
Development Goals in their cities. Through a partnership between United
Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) and the Millennium Campaign, UCLG
members across the world will show their commitments to the MDGs by
displaying large white banners on City Halls and other government
buildings.

In New York City, citizens will Stand Up and Dance on October 16 at a Friday evening party organized by Mercy Corps and the ONE Campaign to pressure the United States Congress to pass the Roadmap to End Global Hunger plan.

At
McGill University in Canada, the entire football stadium will be asked
to Stand Up against poverty at the university’s homecoming game on
October 17.

Visit www.standagainstpoverty.org/map for a full list of events.

Among the millions of people who will again Stand Up to affect change from their governments are:

Monica
Amollo, a Kenyan woman who after being told she won a Parliamentary
election, saw her seat handed to a male opponent. To try to affect
policy change, she organized the first-ever public anti-poverty rally
in Kenya’s Nyanza province, where women spoke about being sexually
harassed on Lake Victoria while trying to access fish — their main
means of livelihood. The women petitioned their local authorities, and
police immediately began cracking down on harassment. Today, women in
the area are able to work with a greater sense of security.

Chendramma,
a 48 year-old poor tribal woman from India’s lowest caste, who
spearheaded public rallies during “Stand Up” in 2008 and organized a
human chain to demand fair, equal and productive employment
opportunities. Taking inspiration from the massive mobilization,
anti-poverty campaigners filed a Public Interest Litigation in the High
Court of Andhra Pradesh, demanding wages in line with the country’s
Minimum Wages Act. The effort culminated in great success when on July
3, 2009, the State Government revised wages under the National Rural
Employment Guarantee Act as per the demands of the citizens.

The mobilization is organized globally by the United Nations Millennium Campaign and Global Call to Action against Poverty (GCAP).

Hiring? Laying Off? What You Must Know Now (BusinessWeek)

Nine months into the Obama Administration, and 20 months (or so) into the current recession, the business community is justifiably asking itself: "What's next?" Many business leaders are tracking the long list of potential labor-friendly (aka "business-hostile") initiatives and litigation trends, including: an expected increase in audit and enforcement activity by the U.S. Labor Dept., the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and other state and federal agencies brought about by increased funding; proposals for mandatory paid medical leave and required health and welfare benefits; more equal pay discrimination claims based on the recently passed Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act; a seemingly endless uptick in individual and class-action lawsuits, as millions of laid-off employees explore their options with emboldened plaintiff attorneys; and the resurgence of organized labor in the private sector, regardless of the final form of the Employee Free Choice Act.
While each of these initiatives is of valid concern, they are generally beyond the control of individual employers at this juncture. So perhaps a better concern for employers these days is: "What am I missing as I lay off or rehire employees?" Here are three key possibilities.
Pay Mind to Disparate Impact
First, employers need to properly assess the statistical effect of their employment decisions. Both the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Ricci v. DeStefano (the firefighter promotional-testing case) and the confirmation hearings of now-Justice Sonia Sotomayor have pushed "disparate impact" issues front and center in the current national debate.
Discrimination against minority employees is often thought of as an issue of intent -- "As long as my motives are not discriminatory, I am not discriminating and I will be fine, right?" Not necessarily so. Unlike disparate (discriminatory) treatment cases, disparate impact claims are based on statistics, without regard to intent. The question at the heart of these claims: Did the employer's policy or practice disproportionately affect a protected class of employees? This means that employers need to consider carefully the statistical impact of layoff decisions. And, on the other end, when rehiring after a layoff, the same issue should be considered. Enterprising plaintiffs' lawyers may argue disparate impact if the minority makeup of your company looks markedly different post-rehiring compared with pre-layoff.
It is worth noting that the Ricci case has left many employers in a no-win situation. In that case, the New Haven Fire Dept. would almost certainly have been sued by minority employees if they had used the promotional test results at issue (a test on which minorities disproportionately scored lower). Instead, they were successfully sued by white employees when they didn't use the results -- highlighting the need for careful consideration of employee testing issues.
Read Up on Compensation Law
Company compensation practices present another area of vulnerability when hiring or firing employees. Despite the well-publicized explosion of lawsuits alleging failure to pay overtime and other "wage and hour" violations, many employers remain blissfully unaware of the complicated, treacherous, and arcane rules surrounding employee classification and compensation. Importantly, federal law in this area has no preemptive effect -- which means employers must consider federal, state, and sometimes even local law when deciding such issues.
When terminating employees, key concerns include whether the employee is owed commissions or bonuses (forfeiture provisions or policies are not always lawful) and how quickly final wages must be paid (several states require immediate payment in some circumstances). With regard to hiring or rehiring decisions, recognize that this is the single best time to assure that all planned compensation approaches -- including whether the employee is entitled to overtime under applicable law -- are lawful or at least defensible.
In the End, It's About People
Lastly, perhaps the most important consideration when hiring or terminating an employee is not really a legal issue at all -- it is the so-called "human touch." The fact is, plaintiffs' attorneys rarely file suit over the issue that first drove the employee to visit them. Rather, they leverage the opportunity that a disgruntled employee presents to explore the employer's practices and the employee's experiences to identify and isolate those factors that can be "spun" into a claim. Thus, employers should consider whether their decisions could drive the employee into the arms of a plaintiffs' lawyer (or, for that matter, the arms of organized labor).
The best advice: Treat employees with respect and civility, and don't lose sight of the forest for the trees. It is often prudent to be flexible and meet employees halfway where possible, even when not strictly required. Keep in mind that a minor concession, an accommodation, or a little extra effort early in the process will often head off the major issues before they surface.

Q&A: Yorn, Johansson talk about collaboration

LOS ANGELES – Three years ago, Pete Yorn contacted Scarlett Johansson about recording a duets album. He wanted to create something with a '60s vibe like Serge Gainsbourg's recordings with Brigitte Bardot.
Yorn didn't know if Johansson could sing, but thought she would be a good fit.
"I figured, you know, most actors are multitalented. They've got to be able to do a lot of things and they probably have some ability to sing," the 35-year-old singer-songwriter said.
Last year, Johansson released "Anywhere I Lay My Head," a gauzy assortment of covers of Tom Waits songs. Many argued that her singing voice was hidden behind a curtain of effects so impenetrable, it was impossible to tell if she could sing.
Some fans and critics weren't sold on the idea that she was serious about pursuing a musical path.
Now that "Break Up," her collaboration with Yorn, has been released, does she hope it will add some positive notes to her music career?
Johansson says she's still not looking for anyone's approval.
"I don't hope for anything. Of course whenever you put something out you hope that people are into it," the 24-year-old actress said. "But I don't really validate myself through critical praise."
AP: Pete, why did you reach out to Scarlett?
Yorn: For some reason the image I had in my head and the context of the project, Scarlett just seemed right for it. In fact, when I asked her if she would do it I didn't even know she could sing. ... I knew that she was very talented and it was like an afterthought. I was like, "Oh, I'm sure she can sing."
AP: What surprised you the most, musically speaking, about working with her?
Yorn: I was really surprised with how fast she learned the songs. She didn't hear any material beforehand. She came to the studio and I had to teach her the songs very quickly. We didn't have much time because she was very busy at the time.
AP: Scarlett, your first album, "Anywhere I Lay My Head," received mixed reviews. Was that discouraging?
Johansson: No, I mean I'm really proud of ... "Anywhere I Lay My Head." It's a sound that I'm really into. I think for me the most important thing was that I was happy with the end result. ... The entertainment industry in general is that you have to have a thick skin in general to survive it and it's something that I have developed for ... since I was 8 years old. Just projection and praise and all those things. I think it's important to not let that stuff get to your head so you can keep a clear picture of what it is that you want to do.
AP: Scarlett, a lot of people thought it was perhaps going to be a one-time thing when you released your CD last year. Here you are back again. Do you think this will prove to the critics that you're serious about your music career?
Johansson: I don't hope for anything. Of course whenever you put something out you hope that people are into it. But I don't really validate myself through critical praise. You know it's wonderful to have that but you know you expect when you put something out that people are going to like it, some people aren't going to like it.
___
On the Net:

http://www.peteyorn.com/

US, EU meet with Bosnians in talks dubbed Dayton 2

SARAJEVO, Bosnia-Herzegovina – European and U.S. officials sat down with leaders in Bosnia on Friday for talks aimed at putting the country on a quicker path to EU and NATO membership.
In a sign Bosnians take the meeting very seriously, they have dubbed it "Dayton 2" — a reference to the U.S.-brokered 1995 peace negotiations in Ohio that ended a war between Muslim Bosniaks, Christian Orthodox Serbs and Roman Catholic Croats.
The European Union and U.S. have long been worried over ethnic tensions in Bosnia and the slow pace of reforms since then. Friday's talks were aimed at outlining a plan on how to overcome a stalemate that keeps Bosnia behind other regional countries seeking to join the 27-nation EU and NATO.
Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt and U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Jim Steinberg presented a joint EU-U.S. proposal to the leaders of Bosnia's main parties at a military base near Sarajevo.
The contents of the document have not been made public, but EU and U.S. officials said earlier that all sides in Bosnia will have to swallow things they perhaps will not like if they want the country to move forward.
The Dayton negotiations produced a hastily written constitution that has proven good enough to end a war, but not to create a functioning country.
It divided the country into a Serb Republic and a Bosniak-Croat Federation, linked by common institutions. It created an enormous administration with three presidents, three parliaments and several hundred ministers on various levels in a country of 3.5 million people.
The division of authority between the institutions of the two regions and the state remains unclear and each side interprets it in different ways.
It has worked so far only because the country has had an international administrator with the authority to ultimately interpret the agreement, fire local officials and impose laws when local politicians cannot agree.
This is why Bosnia is viewed as an international protectorate and as such the EU believes it does not fit the profile of a country that deserves membership. Transforming it into a functioning country has proved difficult because its three peoples have opposing views of its future.
Officials in the Serb Republic generally seek as much autonomy as possible. They are trying to keep the ethnic division of the country and get rid of the international administrator who has previously prevented them from extending their autonomy almost to the level of a separate state.
Bosniaks want to abolish the two mini-states so the country can join the EU as a unified nation, and they believe the international administrator should stay until there is stability.
Bosnian Croats in general agree with the unification, but believe if the ethnic division is to be kept, then it would be fair they also get their own region.
Olli Rehn, the EU's enlargement commissioner, is also taking part in Friday's negotiations. He told reporters that a constitutional reform should improve the functionality of the state institutions and that only a sovereign country with efficient institutions can be a credible candidate for EU membership.

Common misconceptions about the Nobel Peace Prize

An award that generates as much interest as the Nobel Peace Prize is bound to be surrounded by myths. Geir Lundestad, secretary of the secretive committee that awards the prize, outlines for The Associated Press some of the most common misunderstandings:
• Myth: The awards committee announces a shortlist of candidates.
The committee does not release the names of any candidates and keeps records sealed for 50 years.
• Myth: A campaign for a particular candidate can sway the awards committee.
A campaign could have the exact opposite effect on the fiercely independent committee, which does not want to appear influenced by public pressure.
• Myth: Candidates can be nominated until the last minute.
The nomination deadline is eight months before the announcement, with a strictly enforced deadline of Feb. 1.
• Myth: Anyone can nominate a person or group for the Peace Prize.
No, although Nobel statutes on who can nominate were slightly broadened in 2003. They now include former laureates; current and former members of the committee and their staff; members of national governments and legislatures; university professors of law, theology, social sciences, history and philosophy; leaders of peace research and foreign affairs institutes; and members of international courts of law.
• Myth: The prize can be revoked if a laureate does not live up to the standards of the peace prize.
There are no provisions for revoking the prize.
• Myth: The prize can be awarded posthumously.
The prize was award posthumously only once — in 1961, to former U.N. Secretary-General Dag Hammerskjold, after he was killed in a plane crash in Africa. The rules were amended in 1974 to prohibit posthumous prizes.
• Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful.
More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments.
___
On the Net:
http://www.nobelpeaceprize.org

Whodunit? Sneak attack on U.S. dollar (Politico)

It’s the biggest mystery in global finance right now: Who conducted a sneak attack on the U.S. dollar this week?
It began with a thinly sourced but highly explosive report Monday in a British newspaper: Arab oil sheiks are conspiring with the Russians and Chinese to quit using the dollar to set the value of oil trades — a direct threat to the global supremacy of the greenback.
Is it true? Everyone from the head of the Saudi central bank to U.S. officials scrambled to undercut the story, but no matter.
With the U.S. economy on the ropes and America by far the world’s biggest debtor, investors aren’t feeling as secure about the dollar as they used to. And the notion of second-tier economies ganging up on Uncle Sam didn’t sound so far-fetched.
For American officials, the possibility of the dollar losing its long-term dominance in global commerce is a nightmare scenario because it would likely mean sharply higher interest rates at home and a declining ability to finance the U.S. debt. No one believes it could really happen right now, but stories like the British report this week make it seem incrementally more likely.
So the piece by Robert Fisk of the Independent shocked currency traders around the world and almost instantly sent the value of the U.S. dollar spiraling downward and the price of gold skyrocketing to an all-time high, as a hedge against a weakened dollar.
The website drudgereport.com quickly amplified the impact of the story with a headline atop the site: ARAB STATES LAUNCH SECRET MOVES WITH CHINA, RUSSIA, FRANCE TO STOP USING DOLLAR FOR OIL TRADING ...
“You read that story, and you do two things: You sell the hell out of dollars and you buy gold,” said Les Alperstein, president of the financial research firm Washington Analysis. “The story has a lot of credibility, with some caveats.”
So who wanted dollars diving and gold rising? In other words, who is Fisk’s source, and why did he or she want to tank the dollar? It’s the global currency version of the old Washington parlor game of speculating on the real identity of Deep Throat.
No one knows.
But one thing is for certain: With the price of gold jumping to $1,048.20 per ounce, traders who moved early enough stood to make millions.
So in government circles in Washington, speculation immediately centered on gold traders: With the skyrocketing price of gold, they’d be the biggest beneficiaries of the article. 
Fisk’s story itself isn’t much help in solving the mystery — it is sourced vaguely to “Gulf Arab and Chinese banking sources in Hong Kong,” and it included one blind quote, attributed to “a prominent Hong Kong broker.” That doesn’t narrow down the pool very much.
The story doesn’t name any officials who had allegedly participated in the secret meetings involving the Arab states. It didn’t say where the meetings occurred or when. Other than saying the plan is to stop using the dollar by 2018, there was precious little detail to the account.
Around the world, traders turned to Wikipedia to find out more about Fisk himself. There, they learned that Fisk is a legendary British foreign correspondent who has been based in Beirut for more than 30 years and has won a slew of journalism awards. They also learned that he is one of only a few journalists to have interviewed Osama bin Laden (three times) and that he has expressed doubts that the United States has told the full story about the Sept. 11 attacks.
An analyst’s report from the Royal Bank of Scotland concluded, “Fisk is a veteran of the Middle East. ... he is also increasingly associated with more radical theories thus weakening the credibility of the story.”
Beyond the specifics of the story, the geopolitical implications of the report sent shudders from Riyadh to London to Washington: Has the long-dominant American economy been so humbled by the economic crisis that these nations would mount a frontal attack on the dollar, the underpinning of the world’s biggest economy?
That question is on the minds of global investors, who are keeping a skittish eye on the weakening dollar. And over the past several months there has been a steady drumbeat of Chinese, Russian and other officials who have talked openly about finding a replacement for the dollar as the global economy’s default currency. Any effort to do that would be fraught with difficulty. But however unlikely, the possibility represents a threat to the American economy, which has come to depend on the significant advantages it reaps from minting the currency most used around the world.

In another era, the dollar could shrug off such a vaguely sourced, thinly detailed story.

But not anymore.

The dollar is weak and vulnerable to rumor-mongering because many traders believe it will only get weaker. “The fundamental reason why this occurred is that after 9.8 percent unemployment on Friday, nobody can say with certainty that the recovery is sustainable,” said one analyst familiar with the situation.

“In years past, when the U.S. economic dominance was more pronounced and emerging markets were marginal players in the global economy,” noted an analyst’s report from HSBC, “the debate on pricing commodities in currencies other than the [U.S. dollar] typically came down to the lack of practicality. ... Today, emerging markets are clearly wielding much more influence in the global economy, and they want more, as will be borne out in this week’s IMF meetings.”

And that means U.S. officials whose job it is to defend the dollar may have their work cut out for them in the months to come.

Read More Stories from POLITICOPalin notably absent from gov. racesBarack Obama wins Nobel Peace PrizeVIDEO: Rush vs ScarboroughSenators who could lose in 2010The magnificent seven

'Frasier' star returning to NY hometown for event

SARATOGA SPRINGS, N.Y. – Emmy and Tony-winning Actor David Hyde Pierce is returning to his upstate New York hometown to play a rebuilt organ in the church he attended while growing up.
Pierce and his three siblings donated the funds to rebuild the 1920 Skinner organ at the Bethesda Episcopal Church in Saratoga Springs, 25 miles north of Albany.
Pierce will perform during a service dedicating the instrument on Sunday. He was an assistant to the church organist as a teen.
The rebuilt organ will be named the George and Laura Pierce Gallery Organ in memory of Pierce's parents.
Pierce was a four-time Emmy winner during his 11-year role as Dr. Niles Crane on TV's "Frasier," and he won a Tony in 2007 for his role as a musical-theater-loving detective in the Broadway musical, "Curtains."
___
Information from: The Saratogian, http://www.saratogian.com

EU, US to press Bosnia over blocked reforms

SARAJEVO (AFP) –
Senior EU and US officials launched talks with Bosnian leaders here on Friday on how to reform the country's constitution and unblock a political stalemate, the worst since the 1992-1995 war.

Seven Bosnian leaders, including Bosnian Serb Prime Minister Milorad Dodik and two Muslim leaders Haris Silajdzic and Sulejman Tihic, were taking part in the talks that are taking place at the military base of the EU Force (EUFOR) in Sarajevo, an AFP photographer reported.

The meeting was being chaired by Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, whose country holds the EU presidency until the end of the year, and US Deputy Secretary of State Jim Steinberg.

Brussels and Washington unexpectedly announced the meeting last week expressing their serious concern about the political deadlock and need to resume progress towards European integration.

It follows a visit in May by US Vice President Joe Biden and EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana, who said they gave Bosnian leaders an "electric shock" to shape up on reforms.

Bildt and Steinberg said in an open letter to Bosnian citizens on the eve of the meeting the "fundamental issues" to be discussed are "completion (of the conditions) for the closure of the Office of the High Representative (OHR) ... and constitutional changes to achieve functionality and efficiency of government structures."

The High Representative -- a position created under the peace deal that ended Bosnia's 1992-1995 war -- has the power to impose laws and sack obstructive local officials.

The post of international envoy was due to be phased out in 2007 but the mandate was extended because of political instability and the failure of local politicians to pass reforms.

Conditions for the OHR closure include the international community's positive assessment of the situation in ethnically-divided Bosnia.

Since the 1992-1995 war Bosnia has consisted of two semi-independent entities -- the Serbs' Republika Srpska and the Muslim-Croat Federation -- linked with weak central institutions.

In a bid to make the country more functional and bring it closer to Europe the international community has been insisting on strengthening the central institutions at the expense of the ethnic entities and reforming the constitution.

Bosnia remains riven by ethnic tensions among its Croats, Muslims and Serbs.

The dispute underlines deep divisions over how to organise the country, with Serbs insisting on retaining autonomy while Muslims and Croats favour stronger central institutions.

Analysts say that the political climate in Bosnia -- where inter-ethnic war left at least 100,000 people dead and more than two million homeless -- has deteriorated so much that only a strong push by the international community could make local leaders reach an agreement on reforms.

The EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn who is also taking part in talks, said earlier that there were a "chance to really give a new momentum and make progress toward EU (membership)."

"Only a fully sovereign state which has a functional state structure is a credible candidate for the EU," Rehn said upon his arrival here on Thursday.

"By taking actions on these issues the country can send credible application for EU membership even quite soon " he stressed.

Bosnia signed a Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Brussels in 2008, seen as the first step towards membership in the bloc.